Why Build With Advantage

Built on .NET. Not stuck in 2010.

A full enterprise CMS and commerce platform — server-rendered pages with interactive islands, a REST API the platform itself runs on, and the price printed on this page instead of hidden behind a sales call.

Book a technical walkthrough

01 · Where we fit

You already have an alternative in mind. Here's the honest comparison.

Three platforms take almost every shortlist in this category. None of them is a bad product. They just cost you something specific, and it's rarely the licence fee.

Our price, in public

$1,399 USD / month

$199 per additional domain

Sitecore, Optimizely and Adobe will not print theirs. That's not an oversight — a published number can be compared, and comparison is what a six-figure quote is structured to avoid.

If you're leaning toward	What it costs you	Where we sit
WordPress + plugins Cheapest to start	Every capability is a separate vendor on a separate release cycle. The integration labour never appears on the invoice, and upgrade day is when you find out which plugin didn't survive.	One platform on one upgrade path. Your custom code compiles against the same assemblies the rest of the system does, so it moves when the platform moves.
Sitecore · Optimizely · Adobe Genuinely capable	Six figures before implementation, and a quote you cannot obtain without entering a sales process. Budget approval happens before you know what you're approving.	A comparable shape of capability, multi-site, multi-brand, versioned content, and commerce at a number you can take to finance this afternoon.
Contentful · Strapi · Sanity Excellent API	There is no page. Your developers get a clean content API and your editors get abstract field forms, with the front end becoming a second project to staff and maintain.	The same API, plus the page builder, the preview and the admin your editors actually work in. Headless is a delivery option here, not a trade you're forced into.

Naming them is the point. A vendor who won't say who else you're considering is managing the conversation, not answering it.

02 · Custom code · vs WordPress

Your code is a peer, not a plugin.

A plugin is a guest in someone else's house. It reaches into internals it doesn't own, and it breaks on upgrade because nothing promised it wouldn't. Here, a module you write is the same kind of object as a module we wrote.

You write four things

Entity

Your data shape

API controller

How it's read and written

UI file

What it renders

Manifest

How the platform finds it

And you inherit all of this, unwritten

Admin screens

Role permissions

Content versioning

Draft, publish, rollback

What this means on a Tuesday afternoon

There is no build step between editing a file and reloading the page, you change the UI file, refresh, and it's there. No watcher to keep running, no bundle to wait for.

Your module's REST endpoints work the way the platform's own do, because the API is how the platform talks to itself rather than a tier bolted on afterwards. Endpoint security is declared per controller, session and role checks are supported and you opt each one in, so treat that as a decision your team makes, not a default you inherit.

03 · Scale · vs WordPress and mid-market DXP

One install, every brand.

The multi-site answer elsewhere is usually more installs — a network of sites, or a licence per property. Each one is a thing to upgrade, and brand consistency becomes a policy document nobody reads.

Here, brands and domains are structure inside one installation, and brand tokens cascade into every module, including modules that brand never touched. Add a module next year and it arrives already wearing each brand's type, colour and spacing.

Scenario · an agency with twelve clients

One installation. One upgrade. Twelve brands that never see each other's tokens.

One installation

Brand A

.com .ca

Brand B

.com shop

Brand C

.com /lang

Brand tokens cascade down, type, colour, spacing, into every module on every domain above.

A twelfth client is structure, not another installation to patch.

04 · Editing · vs Contentful, Strapi, Sanity

Headless without making your editors pay for it.

Here's the part nobody warns buyers about. Going headless is a developer upgrade and an editor downgrade, the same decision that frees your front end takes the page away from the people who write it.

Pure headless · what the editor sees

A form. No page, no layout, no idea what it'll look like.

hero_heading · string

Built on .NET. Not stuck in…

hero_body · richtext

A full enterprise CMS and commerce platform — server-rendered pages…

cta_ref · reference[]

cta_9f42a1

Every layout question becomes a developer ticket, and the front end is a second codebase to staff.

Here · what the editor sees

The page. Sections in place, preview live, API still there.

Hero section

Selected · editing in place

Feature grid

Pricing table

Contact form

Native REST across entities is there for whoever wants it and the page builder doesn't go away when they use it.

05 · Delivery · vs enterprise DXP

From design to a running site, without the nine-month redesign.

Every platform in this category claims to convert designs. What matters is what you get back. Web Studio matches sections to modules you already own, so a converted section arrives connected to live data with an admin screen behind it, not as markup full of placeholder text that someone still has to wire up. Each conversion comes with a report of exactly what bound to what, is checked against your own installation before anything is placed, and installs as a single transaction that can be rolled back.

How Web Studio works

06 · The technical core

Built for what reads it next.

Your next significant visitor may not be a person. Ask any platform on your shortlist what happens when an AI agent wants to query your content, and the answer is a project. Here it's an endpoint that already exists.

An agent asks

GET /ask?q=what plans are available

No integration written. No connector installed. No one on your team notified.

Your site answers, structured

{
  "@context": "schema.org",
  "@type": "Offer",
  "price": "1399.00",
  "priceCurrency": "USD"
}

Schema.org JSON-LD — a shape every model already understands, so the answer it repeats is the one you published.

A built-in MCP server

JSON-RPC 2.0, shipped with the platform. An agent that speaks MCP can work with your content without anyone building a bridge for it first.

Server-rendered, with a strict policy

Pages arrive as HTML with interactive islands where they're needed, under a strict content security policy with a per-request nonce.

We'd rather tell you the reason this section is short: nobody in this category is leading with any of it yet, which means there is no competitor page to compare it against. Judge it on the endpoint, not on the paragraph.

07 · Exit · vs SaaS-only platforms

Run it where you want.

Most platforms on your shortlist have one answer to "where does this run," and it's their cloud. Ask what leaving looks like and the conversation gets vague. Here there are two deployments of the same build.

Managed

On Azure, run by us

A web application firewall and CDN at the edge, and nothing for your team to patch on a Friday.

Self-hosted

On your infrastructure

Your database on your own network, for the procurement conversation where that's the whole conversation. Same build — not a cut-down edition.

And the front end isn't locked in either

A conversion can output a standalone Next.js project pointed at any headless CMS. It's an odd thing for a platform vendor to build, and it's the most honest answer we have to "what if we leave."

08 · What we're not

Four reasons to choose something else.

If you only read one section, read this one. Everything above is easier to write than it is to mean.

We're not the cheapest way to put a brochure site online

WordPress is, by a long way, and for a marketing site that doesn't need to talk to anything, that's the right call. This platform earns its price when there are several brands, real integrations, or a transaction involved.

We're not a fit if your team wants zero .NET in the stack

Plenty of engineering teams have made that call deliberately, and we're not going to argue you out of it. The modules are .NET and that isn't changing.

We're compliant

The platform is SOC 2 ready, we are ISO certified. If your procurement process requires one on paper, tell us on the first call and we'll tell you honestly where we are rather than letting you find out in month three.

We're a small team, and you'll notice

You'll talk to the people who wrote the code. For some buyers that's the entire reason to choose us; for others it's a procurement risk they can't sign off, and both of those are reasonable readings of the same fact.

Test one claim on this page.

Pick whichever one you trust least and bring it to the call. That's a faster way to judge a platform than any deck we could send.

Book a technical walkthrough